Radio Show
      Listen Host Guests Archive
On The Side

View the Latest Action Alerts and Stay informed!

Read our current Commentaries for indepth analysis into hot issues!




September 2002   Alan Stang
Let Us Prey: The Horror In The Church By Alan Stang

Let Us Prey: The Horror in the Church

I am not a Roman Catholic, but in the historic enclave were I was raised, pretty much the only people we knew of were Catholics and Jews. Needless to say, everyone was a Democrat and believed that Franklin Roosevelt had been sent there by God, or maybe that he was God Himself. Once in a while, an inmate who got out would return with preposterous tales of other people called “Protestants” and “Republicans.” Of course, no one paid any attention. After all, how dumb can you get? So, I set these observations forth as an outsider, in the belief that the horror in progress inside the Roman Catholic Church today is supremely important to all of us, Catholic or otherwise, because of what it means to other churches and to the country. What is happening is not just the haphazard eruption of predatory sodomites with their collars on backwards; rather, as you will see, the metastasizing horror appears to be well orchestrated. Let’s go back to the beginning, which many scholars say is May 1, 1776. On that date, Adam Weishaupt, a professor of canon law at Ingolstadt University, in what is now Germany, founded the Society of Illuminati. The Illuminists worked in secret, using noms de guerre, and recruited the sons of the wealthiest, best-born, most powerful families into their conspiracy. The goal of the Illuminists was to impose a dictatorship that would enslave the entire world, in the course of which all religion would be destroyed. Eventually, they were raided by the forces of the Elector of Bavaria, who seized some of their paperwork, which found its way into the work of Scottish Professor John Robison, who wrote Proofs of a Conspiracy (1798), which will tell you from their own mouths how the Illuminists recruited. You could also consult the four-volume Memoirs of the History of Jacobinism, by the Abbé Barruel, which, if memory serves, has recently been reissued in a new translation. The Elector’s fine work did not completely squelch the conspirators, who simply fled Bavaria and went to Paris, where they infiltrated the Grand Orient Lodges of the Masonic Order, which they used to foment the French Revolution in 1789. In Paris, they began to implement their scheme to destroy all religion, and since the Roman Catholic Church at the time still had immense political, as well as ecclesiastical power, the conspirators did what they could to wreck it. The Illuminati later metastasized into the Communist movement, which in 1848 hired an unknown degenerate named Karl Marx to write a manifesto that would memorialize the revolution they were planning for that year. Now, let’s move along to the Twentieth Century. Where did the latest extrusion of the sodomite movement originate? According to expert Stuart Timmons, in The Trouble With Harry Hay, Founder of the Modern Gay Movement (Boston, Alyson, 1990), modern sodomy derives from an outfit called the Mattachine Society, all of whose founders, just after World War II, were Marxists. Harry Hay himself, for instance, the preeminent founder, had been a Party member. Indeed, says Timmons, in structuring the new Communist homosexual group, Harry Hay “followed the Masonic model.” (p. 152). Indeed, “Harry had found his model, the Freemasons of the eighteenth century, in his music research. The Masons had been illegal and underground at that time . . . .” (italics added) Now, browse with me through another manifesto entitled After the Ball, How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the ‘90s (New York, Doubleday, 1989), by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen. The authors teach that sodomites should “inundate” straights (normal men and women) “in a continuous flood of gay-related advertising . . . .” (p. 149). The advertising will perpetrate something called “jamming,” which they explain as follows: “. . . Thus propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homohating bigots as crude loudmouths and a**holes—people who say not only ‘faggot’ but ‘nigger,’ ‘kike,’ and other shameful epithets—who are ‘not Christian.’ . . .” (p. 151) The goal is something they call “conversion,” which is worse than old-fashioned subversion. “ . . . Yet, ironically, by Conversion we actually mean something far more profoundly threatening to the American Way of Life . . . . We mean conversion of the average American’s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. . . .” (p. 153) (italics added) On the next page, they admit that those ads will be lies. “. . . But it makes no difference that the ads are lies; not to us, because we’re using them to ethically good effect . . . .” In other words, the end justifies the means, a hallowed commandment to all Marxists. The important thing, they say, is to keep talking, talking, talking, because the more they talk about sodomy, the more “tiresome” and normal it will seem. Finally, Kirk and Madsen say this: “[A]ctivists have concentrated their efforts on politics, meaning efforts to secure gay rights by conspiring with liberal elites within the legal and legislative systems.” (Pp. 170-71) Remember, the word “conspiring” is theirs, not mine. Indeed: “. . . The goal here has been to forge a little entente or conspiracy with the power elite, to jump ahead of public sentiment or ignore it altogether.” They speak of the successful use of “many executive orders (which side-step the democratic process) . . . .” (italics added) Now ask yourself, is all this a mere fantasy, or has it been happening? The point is that the present sodomite explosion is by no means haphazard; you are being subjected to a brilliantly orchestrated plan, the first gambit in which was the founding of the Mattachine Society by Reds. And remember that all of this comes from the connivers themselves, what our friends the lawyers call an “admission against interest.” Finally, remember that according to the holiest writ of the sodomite movement, people are born homosexual. No choice is involved. Sodomites can no more blamed for sodomy than “straights” can be blamed for heterosexuality. But Kirk and Madsen say as follows on page 184 in a parenthesis: “. . . (We argue that, for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay—even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence.) To suggest in public that homosexuality might be chosen is to open the can of worms labeled ‘moral choice and sin’ and give the religious Intransigents a stick to beat us with. . . .” In other words, sodomites are made. The idea that people are “born gay” is another conspiratorial lie; is nothing but another media gambit designed to keep the lid tightly on that sinful “can of worms.” How else could rescue groups be salvaging so many from the sodomite lifestyle and restoring them to normal life? The sodomite onslaught in the media, in the schools and everywhere else has been designed to convince us that sodomy is as normal as apple pie and baseball. Some guys like blondes. Some guys like brunettes. And, according to the lie, some guys like guys. But the horror in the Church proves the point that sodomites are made, not born; that they must recruit because they can’t give birth—and that sodomy by its nature includes preying upon children. Years ago, when subversion was starting to show up in many Protestant denominations, observers who weren’t Catholic would nevertheless applaud the fact that there were no signs of it in the Catholic Church; they said that at least the Catholics still upheld the basic principles of Christianity. What happened? My speculation is that subversion—and now perversion—just took longer to show up in the Catholic Church. Because Protestantism is what it is, anyone can open a storefront church. Because the Catholic Church is hierarchical, however, it no doubt took many years for the termites to work their way high enough in the hierarchy so that they could safely “come out.” All right, we now have the context we need to look at what is happening in the Roman Catholic Church. Next week, we’ll see what the sodomite conspiracy is doing in the seminaries; we’ll see the real reason there is a “shortage” of priests. That should give you everything you need to answer the question of whether what is happening is just routine perversion, or whether it is part of an attempt to destroy the Church. Be with your Intrepid Correspondent then. Copyright © 2002 by Alan Stang Alan Stang is a member of the Distinguished Board of Advisors to The Welch Foundation